WP 3 Enterprise groups

Introduction

Insolvency or restructuring of groups of companies (enterprise groups) creates specific challenges in practice. Since 2017 a set of rules has been included in the EU Insolvency Regulation, whilst in 2019 UNCITRAL’s Draft Model Law on Enterprise Groups Insolvency has been developed. Application of these rules and their development is critically followed. In the EU, the appointment of a ‘group coordinator’ is possible. See Working Party (Code of conduct for the group coordinator).


Chairs

Nora Wouters
Prof. Stephan Madaus


Current Projects

EU group coordination proceedings
Reporters: Prof. Andreas Geroldinger, Dr. Myriam Mailly, Prof. Stephan Madaus and Nora Wouters
Research Associates: Mr. Sid Pepels


Completed Projects

  • Pros and cons of EU group coordination proceedings
    CERIL identifies the fact that the EU ‘group coordination proceedings’ system is not used in practice, resulting in inefficient administration of insolvency proceedings relating to different companies forming part of a group of companies. The study comprised of two parts: (1) a review of relevant literature on the subject, and (2) interviews with relevant insolvency practitioners within the EU. In addition to the Statement, the reporters present an annex comprising an overview of the pros and cons of the current framework for EU group coordination proceedings.

    Reporters: Prof. Andreas Geroldinger, Dr. Myriam Mailly, Prof. Stephan Madaus and Nora Wouters

    This project resulted in:
     - CERIL Statement 2021-2 on EU group coordination proceedings
     
  • A Reply on the UNCITRAL’s Model Law on Enterprise Groups Insolvency
    CERIL highlights the recent work of UNCITRAL on a Model Law on Enterprise Group Insolvency (MLG). Following a prior consultation in 2019 – to which CERIL and the European Law Institute (ELI) made a joint contribution – this report analyses the amendments made in the final text, as adopted by UNCITRAL’s Commission in July 2019. In line with recommendations made in the CERIL-ELI Report 2019-1, the multiple amendments were incorporated contributing to a more effective functioning of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Enterprise Group Insolvency.

    Reporters: Nora Wouters and Prof. Stephan Madaus
    Research Associate: Ilya Kokorin

    This project resulted in:
     - CERIL Statement 2019-3 on A Reply to UNCITRAL’s Model Law on Enterprise Group Insolvency
     
  • UNCITRAL’s Draft Model Law on Enterprise Groups Insolvency
    This Working Group of CERIL investigated in cooperation with the European Law Institute (ELI) the structure and text of the UNCITRAL draft model on enterprise group insolvency, in order to amend, modify or clarify its text to be ready to enact as a national law. It proposes seventeen recommendations to amend the draft model law as suggested in this Report. These recommendations are focusing on essential definitions (such as planning proceeding), the scope of the envisaged draft model law (international jurisdiction), the improvement of suggested provisions of cooperation and coordination, the criteria for appointment of an insolvency representative or a group representative, the participation of group members in certain procedures, the organisation of planning proceedings as well as the possibility of providing an undertaking in relation to certain proceedings or claims.

    Reporters: Nora Wouters and Prof. Stephan Madaus

    Research Associate: Ilya Kokorin

    The project resulted in:
    - CERIL Statement 2019-1 on the CERIL-ELI Report on UNCITRAL’s Draft Model Law on Enterprise Groups Insolvency
    - CERIL-ELI Report 2019-1 on UNCITRAL’s Draft Model Law on Enterprise Groups Insolvency


Current Projects

-


Members part of

WP 03 Enterprise Groups

Michal Barlowski Ordinary Conferee
Pavel Boulatov Ordinary Conferee
Ieva Broka Ordinary Conferee
Kathlene Burke Ordinary Conferee
Bart De Moor Ordinary Conferee
Anja Droege Gagnier Ordinary Conferee
Juana Pulgar Ezquerra Academic Conferee
Patryk Filipiak Academic Conferee
Jasnica Garašić Academic Conferee
Francisco Garcimartin Academic Conferee
Rita Gismondi Ordinary Conferee
Bartosz Groele Ordinary Conferee
Ferdinand Hengst Ordinary Conferee
Ivan Ikrényi Ordinary Conferee
Marie KT Karlsson-Tuula Academic Conferee
Ilya Kokorin Academic Conferee
Antonio Leandro Academic Conferee
Carlos Mack-Castelletti Ordinary Conferee
Stephan Madaus Co-Chair/Academic Conferee
Myriam Mailly Academic Conferee
Renato Mangano Academic Conferee
Irit Mevorach Academic Conferee
Elina Moustaira Academic Conferee
Nicoleta Mirela Năstasie Judicial Conferee
Luciano Panzani Academic Conferee
Gabriella Pataki Ordinary Conferee
Christoph Paulus Academic Conferee
Rodrigo Rodriguez Academic Conferee
Omar Salah Ordinary Conferee
Jessica Schmidt Academic Conferee
Dominik Skauradszun Academic Conferee
Petr Sprinz Ordinary Conferee
Adrian Thery Ordinary Conferee
Joeri Vananroye Academic Conferee
Reinout Vriesendorp Ordinary Conferee
Bob Wessels Academic Conferee
Nora Wouters Co-Chair/Academic Conferee
Oleg Zaitsev Academic Conferee
Đuro M. Đurić Academic Conferee